The criterion validity demonstrated only a fair degree of differential association with the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L-VAS. Visualization and supervision: B.P.-H. and E.A.-C. All authors: Reviewing and editing the manuscript. MeSH The total score was accounted for, not the individual questionnaire response items. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) into Brazilian Portuguese in patients with chronic upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) [1416] and the shortened QuickDASH [17] version are two prominent examples. Garratt, A. 0000075890 00000 n Project administration: A.I.C.-V., C.R.-J., B.P.-H. and E.A.-C. Conceptualization and methodology: A.I.C.-V. and C.R.-J. The Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) is a self-report questionnaire that evaluates disability and health-related quality of life after stroke (Mudler & Nijland, 2016). Patient-Reported Upper Extremity Outcome Measures Used in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review. Background: The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is an internationally widely used outcome measure with robust, valid psychometric properties. Upper Limb functional Index - Spanish Version Validation HQoL 2013 2018 Dec;18(6):e1261-e1267. Schmitz, K.H. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the upper limb functional index, http://www.proqolid.org/instruments/upper_limb_functional_index_ulfi?fromSearch=yes&text=yes, http://www.un.org/spanish/News/fullstorynews.asp?news, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010, 10: 161. Arooj A, Amjad F, Tanveer F, Arslan AU, Ahmad A, Gilani SA. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has been validated across different populations and languages. Estimating the Reliability and Validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery. Clinimetrics: Upper Extremity Functional Index - Western University Martn-Martn J, Pajares-Hachero B, Alba-Conejo E, Ribelles N, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Roldn-Jimnez C. Int J Environ Res Public Health. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas and Phillip C Gabel participated in the analysis and interpretation of data and were involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. 0000073873 00000 n Accessibility La validit transversale, de groupes connus et longitudinale a t confirme pour les deux mesures de l'IFMS. Factor structure was one-dimensional and supported construct validity. Before Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010,91(9):13701377. Descriptive analyses were applied to calculate means and standard deviations of demographic variables (Table1). A total of 126 volunteers (4921years, 54.8% female) with a variety of upper limb conditions of >12weeks duration were recruited consecutively from the Physical Therapy Clinic at the Malaga University. 0000155003 00000 n Bookshelf Patients respond to each item by circling a number that best describes their level of difficulty. Though various region specific PROs have been used to assess upper-limb functional status, it is accepted that there is no gold standard [8, 1012]. Finally, the inclusion of Hispanic/Latino/ South American participants in future studies could potentially provide confirming or conflicting linguistic information due to the cultural and ethnic difference with respect to the Spanish participants. Cronbach LJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Please provide an answer for each activity. J Hand Ther 2001,14(2):6876. Tonga E, Durutrk N, Gabel PC, Tekindal A. J Hand Ther. Bone Joint Surg Am 2012,94(3):277285. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2004,47(6):389395. upper extremity functional index calculator Int. Man Ther 2011,16(2):177182. 0000100655 00000 n 0000000016 00000 n 2022 Oct 26;93(5):e2022307. 0000153760 00000 n 10.1157/13093053. 2001;53:25967. 2023 Feb 24;14:989403. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.989403. Cross-cultural adaptation of the upper limb functional index in Arabic. The .gov means its official. However, over the last two decades region specific PROs that represent the three key body regions, of the upper limb, lower limb and spine have been used more frequently in the assessment of a musculoskeletal patients functional status [5]. The exclusion criteria were under 18 years old and low reading comprehension due to completing the questionnaire.
Naia Outdoor Track Nationals 2021 Qualifying Standards,
Jamison Family Missing Psychic,
Articles U