Another argument that can be made against humanitarian interventions is that by taking military action against those committing atrocities, actually more lives can be lost. Pros And Cons Of Military Intervention (2020, May 23). Arguments are often made for humanitarian interventions when there are reports of extensive and wide-spread human rights abuses. To be able to undertake a humanitarian intervention means massive amounts of money must be committed. This online course shows the challenges in doing this and the international security context that surrounds humanitarian interventions. Covert The U.S. has a long history of conflict intervention starting with the Barbary Wars during the presidency of Thomas Jefferson. Also problematic is safely destroying or at least securing such weapons from dangerous actors. WebOne of the worst downsides of signing up is not being able to quit. The Future of Security Assistance. As the world continues to face challenges from conflicts and instability, it is important to carefully consider all possible solutions before deciding on military intervention. This accounting makes clear that military force was either used or contemplated by the United States in myriad settings and for various aims. Similarly, it is possible to mention the ethnic hostilities in the former Yugoslavia. Your privacy is extremely important to us. He retired in 2005 from a 28-year career in the U.S. intelligence community, with senior positions that included national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia, deputy chief of the DCI Counterterrorist Center and executive assistant to the director of central intelligence. This federal support is often why the Quasi-War is considered one of the first interventions. Such coercion thus remains a risky form of intervention in that it cedes the initiative to the target, which has to decide whether to hold out or to compromise. Some of the problems encountered in Kosovo were tied directly to the decision to use air power alone rather than in conjunction with ground forces. Military intervention can also have the disadvantage of hindering the efforts of humanitarian aid workers and NGOs. Military intervention further politicises their work in the eyes of local people by associating it with foreign troops, and NGOs can become targets, which endangers their lives (Seybolt, 2007: 17). WebThe Pros And Cons Of The American Invasion Of Iraq The American invasion of Iraq in March 2003 led to the collapse of Saddam Hussein, yet unleashed a huge partisan The first major benefit of humanitarian interventions is that they protect civilians.if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'humanitariancareers_com-box-4','ezslot_4',104,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-humanitariancareers_com-box-4-0'); The main aim of a humanitarian intervention is to use military force to stop human rights abuses and atrocities. Military Interventions: Advantages and Disadvantages. Retrieved from https://ivypanda.com/essays/military-interventions-advantages-and-disadvantages/. To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member. So, is military intervention the best solution? peacekeeping Those who argue against humanitarian interventions also state that the funds could be better used to help people in need, such as in economic development or peace building initiatives.